Toyota announced on December 14, 2020, that it is in the late stages of developing solid state battery (SSB) technology that, it claimed, would enable a recharge time of just 10 minutes from empty to 100% full.
Lack of range and long charging times are seen as the main barriers that stop people from dipping their toe in the electric vehicle (EV) world.
Tesla is the world leader in EV range. It uses Panasonic-made lithium-ion batteries in their vehicles which Tesla claims to achieve an energy density of 260Wh/kg (watt per hour).
Solid state batteries are reported to have approximately 2.5 times the energy density of their lithium-ion equivalents. That effectively means a possible energy density of 650Wh/kg for the soon-to-be released SSB.
What Does This Mean For The Tractor Owners?
There are obvious benefits to a tractor using battery power. A farmer using a conventional tractor will often leave it idling while they are opening gates, opening bales, or loading a fertiliser spreader.
All the while the farmers hard-earned money is being blown out of the exhaust.
However, for an EV when it’s not in use it doesn’t use or waste power. Operating an EV in enclosed spaces like a shed for example, won’t pollute the air leaving a safer and healthier environment for the farmer to work in.
This would equate to a theoretical total energy capacity in the battery of 650,000Wh or 650kWh (there are 1,000W in 1kW). The performance in terms of power output and how long this lasts for depends very much on the task at hand for the farmer.
Tractor Battery Charge
For the purposes of this analysis, let’s first assume an eight-hour working day. With 650kWh contained in the battery, this effectively means that the tractor operator would have 81.25kW or about 109hp (horse power) available for the duration of the eight-hour working day.
Any reduction in power requirement increases the theoretical length of the working day to allow for a longer time between charges of the battery pack.
What does this mean for the agricultural contractor? A tractor outputting 108hp will not do the job – increasing the power requirement will reduce the theoretical running time.
Dividing 650kWh by five is 130kW or 174hp. Heavy draft work like ploughing or power harrowing would require all or a large majority of the 174hp available obviously save for turning in the headlands.
However, haulage work such as drawing silage would demand peak power at certain times but almost certainly not all the time, thus likely extending the working block.
Other contractor work such as umbilical slurry spreading would require a fraction of the available 173hp which would increase the working block further.
It’s important to note that in carrying out this analysis, fuel consumption rates may not be 100% accurate. Fuel consumption rates will vary between tractors, and the price of fuel will fluctuate so there is no rate that is absolutely correct.
Using a night rate electricity cost of €0.09+VAT (9c) per kWh for 81.25kWh for charging, leaves a running cost of €7.31/hr for a 108hp electric tractor.
Using equivalent rates, the 174hp electric tractor has a running cost of €11.70/hour while its diesel rival burning 20L/hour will cost €11.40/hour.
As can be seen above, there is no appreciable cost difference between the different power units. It’s feasible in the future for a farmer using a tractor doing light work to choose a solid-state powering option.
If Irish farmers follow their European counterparts and begin installing electricity generating solar panels on farm building roofs, then the EV project becomes a much more economical option.